PETA could do better
PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) is under scrutiny
after two employees were caught dumping animal carcasses in a
supermarket dumpster in South Carolina. This caught many people by
surprise, including many donors.
To be fair, PETA's explanation was that these animals were being
treated inhumanly at a local animal shelter, and that there had been
reports that this animal shelter was using cruel methods to euthanize
unadoptable and unadopted animals, and that PETA had stepped in to
administer humane euthanization to the unwanted pets. They explained
that they do not have enough resources to prevent having to euthanize
many animals, and that there are far too many abandoned animals
nationwide for PETA to take care of or protect.
One could conceivably argue that this situation is the result of the
virtual abandonment of the organization's animal rescue mission, and
the allocation of funds to support radical activities and the
anti-carnivore movement. PETA has, in recent years, become a
social/political activist organization rather than an animal rescue
operation. However, many long-time and large scale donors to PETA
support the organization with the understanding that it is an animal
rescue operation.
The real problem is that the scale on which PETA is trying to operate
its animal rescue operations is much too large. PETA is a global
organization, with few supported local community operations. One need
only to look at the federal government's social welfare programs to
see how inefficient this type of organization can be. Many non-profit
organizations, such as Goodwill and the Salvation Army, realized long
ago that it is far more efficient to operate local community
organizations, rather than trying to take care of everything on a
national level.
In Colorado Springs, for instance, we have an excellent animal rescue
organization called Dream Power, which avoids by every possible means
the need to euthanize animals. Usually, the only time an animal is
euthanized by Dream Power is when it has become too ill to treat.
Dream Power gets most of its funding from local donors, and is
supported by several local vetenary clinics that donate time and
services for spaying and neutering, medications, and vaccinations.
PETA would do better to allocate some of their funding to local
organizations such as Dream Power, rather than trying to keep up with
the cost of the attorneys they need to hire as a result of some of
their radical activities.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment